Page text
AUCTIONPRICE GUIDE
● TURKEY & EASTMEDITERRANEAN
CONTEXT AUCTION PRICE GUIDE
BERGAMA STARMEDALLION RUG CIRCA 1800
1.55 x2.11M (5'1'' x6'11'') SOTHEBY'S NEW YORK,
VOJTECH BLAU SALE 14 DECEMBER 2006,
LOT 83 EST:$25-30,000
SOLD FOR:$132,000
Discussing this lobed-star design Bergama variant in
Historical Turkish Carpets (pl.57), Serare Yetkin wrote:
“Some later versions of the type, with more strongly
geometric lines, are to be found in the T.I.E.M...
These rugs are smaller and a fragmented star medallion
occupies the center of the field. This is a kind of rug
which we do not come across in European
paintings, but which continued to decreasein size,
the design becomingless and less refined, still to be woven during the 19th century.” Her diagram no.30is virtually identical
to the field of the present lot, whichis a relatively early variant of impressive size and in relatively good condition for its age. It is the only example known to us with this styleof pan-Turkic Turkmen
kochanakcartouche border, most having an alternating repeat of star flowerheads and notched polygonson a black ground. It is also theonly example in which the diagonally opposed ‘arms’ of
the central ‘star’ are piled in two different colours, sky blue and green. Otherwise it is similar to a number of published rugs: Denny, The Classical Tradition in Anatolian Carpets, pl.40 (Jon M.
Anderson Collection); Herrmann, SOT VI,no.9 = Edelmann, 15 December 1984, lot 169; as well as the most oft-cited examples, McMullan, Islamic Carpets,pl.45, and Grote-Hasenbalg, Der Orient
teppich, pl.19. Of course, like many other carpets in this extraordinary single owner sale, it set a record for its type.
USHAK MEDALLION RUG LATE 16TH–EARLY
17TH CENTURY 1.14 x1.6M (3'9'' x5'3'')
SOTHEBY'S NEW YORK 14 DECEMBER 2006,LOT 161
EST:$12-15,000 SOLD FOR:$12,000
This unusual variant of the otherwise fairly common double
niche or small-medallion Ushaks (divisible into two sub-groups,
principally according to border type) has a larger and more elab
orate central medallion and florid spandrels whichfill more of the
field, and relates more closely to the large Ushak carpets than do
the others. It was previously sold at SLO on 28 April 1992, lot 94,
for $20,185 (HALI 63, p.132), when we considered it to be an early
and rare specimen from the second half of the 16th century
and pointed to the only at all similar rug in the Türk ve Islam
Eserleri Museum, best illustrated in Ölcer et al., Turkish Carpets
13th-18th Century, pl.89.That has a complex floral border while the
present lot has the more common of the two border types of
the double-niche Ushaks (“arches formed by pairs of floral arabes
ques” containing palmettes and divided by floral sprays, accord
ing to Charles Grant Ellis), that is very well drawn. This border
was current over a long period well into the 17th century so it
gives no clue as to whether the present rug is an early or a late
departure from thetype. Its rarity rather suggests the former. Two
small-medallion Ushaks, one of each sub-group, were sold at
CLO on 17 October 1996, lots 411 and 425,fetching $43,610 and
$50,875. Our comment in HALI 90 (p.120) records five other
SMU sales in the first half of 1990s for very high prices, inclu
ding SNY, 24 September 1991 lot 58 (HALI 60, p.147) for $181,500.
The seller of the present rug must have been verydisappoin
ted by the result: the buyer has reason to congratulate himself.
GÖRDES PRAYER RUG 18TH CENTURY
1.27 x1.6M (4'2'' x5'3'') SOTHEBY'S NEW YORK YORK,
VOJTECH BLAU SALE 14 DECEMBER 2006,LOT 2
EST:$10-15,000 SOLD FOR:$19,200
In Oriental Carpets: A Complete Guide(1998, p.179), Eilandwrote:
“few types present more frustrating problems than the Gordes
prayer rug, as much that has been written about it is clearly fictitious
… Beginning in the late 19th century they were bought at high
prices for decades,but are no longer so avidly sought or fash
ionable”. Indeed, 18th century Kula and Gördes prayer rugs
were the sine qua nonof any serious collection of Turkish rugs
formed before World War II. The main US collector of the genre,
James F. Ballard of St Louis, showed no fewer than eleven in
his 1924 catalogue (pls.18-28). The present rug was published
in Von Konya bis Kokand, no.7, 1980 retail price DM67,500. Herr
mann wrote that “the white tracery in the blue spandrels and the
border with its rosettes and palmettes flanked by curvedleaves
are a reminder that this is a town version of an earlier courtwork
shop design”. The closest comparison to the this rug is pl.37 in
Volker’s Die Orientalische Knupfteppiche im MAK. Others include
Haack, Oriental Rugs, pl.III; Aslanapa, One Thousand Years of Turk
ish Carpets, pl.132, p.173; and Ionescu, Antique Ottoman Rugs
in Transylvania, pls.216-219. The market perception of these rugs
as passé is beginning to change. Recent auction prices include
32,400 for lot 70 at RB on 15 November 2003 and, at CLO on
9 October 2006, $42,636 for lot 70 and $20,196 for lot 56.
BERGAMA RUG LATE 19TH CENTURY
1.98 x2.26M (6'6'' x7'5'') SOTHEBY'S NEW YORK
14 DECEMBER 2006,LOT 209 EST:$10-15,000
SOLD FOR:$22,800 A high price for a late and rather
uninspiring example of a design with a long and distinguished
pedigree. The intricate and iconic central medallion was
first documented in a 15th century painting by Domenico
Ghirlandaio, The Virgin and Child Enthroned(see Erdmann,
Oriental Carpets, fig.19). Two further 15th century carpets
with similar medallions are pictured in Alexander's A Fore
shadowing of 21st Century Art (pp.62, 237). The form of the
medallion continued to be faithfully reproduced by west
Anatolian weavers well into the 19th century, while other elem
ents in the carpets underwent devolutionary changes. For a
17th century example see Herrmann, SOT X, pl.13, with span
drels and a yellow cruciform border. For an 18th century
example see lot 208 in this SNY sale ($3,300). In the 19th cent
ury, the spandrels have disappeared from most examples,
the fields have become crowded with small floral motifs, and
many examples have this variant of serrated leaf border.
The 19th century exemplars have not done particularly well
at auction, the previous best price being under $10,000 (SLO,
21 October 1993, lot 64). Comparable pieces include: a virtu
ally identical rug at Lefevre on 4 October 1974, lot 7; Lefevre,
25 March 1977, lot 31; SLO, 4 October 2000, lot 74; Finarte,
9 November 2005, lot 141; Skinner, 3 November 1983, lot 5;
Bausback 1975, p.85; and HALI 5/3, Gallery p.7.
For more auction results see www.hali.com/apg.aspx
HALI ISSUE 151159
